Revisi per 27 Oktober 2011 12.32 sunting Bennylin (bicara \| kontrib) Pengurus antarmuka, Pengurus 255.211 suntingan Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan ← Revisi sebelumnya		Revisi per 28 Mei 2012 03.57 sunting balikkan Botrie (bicara \| kontrib) Bot 23.060 suntingan k Robot: Perubahan kosmetika Revisi selanjutnya →
Baris 81: From Berlin's ''Karl Marx'', 4th edition, p. 75. This description covers several aspects of what it might be to stand ''too close'' to a subject.</ref> Any situation in which strong relationships can develop may trigger a conflict of interest. Conflict of interest can be personal, religious, political, academic, financial, and legal. It is not determined by area, but is created by relationships that involve a high level of personal commitment to, involvement with, or dependence upon a person, subject, idea, tradition, or organization. Closeness to a subject does not mean you're incapable of being neutral, but it may incline you towards some bias. Be guided by the advice of other editors. If editors on a talk page suggest in good faith that you may have a conflict of interest, try to identify and minimize your biases, and consider withdrawing from editing the article. As a rule of thumb, the more involvement you have with a topic in real life, the more careful you should be with our core content ~~policies—~~policies—[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:No original research]], and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]~~—when~~—when editing in that area. The definition of "too close" in this context is governed by [[common sense]]. An article about a little-known band should preferably not be written by the band's manager or a band member's spouse, and a biography should preferably not be written by the subject's spouse, parent, or offspring. However, an expert on a given subject is welcome to contribute to articles on that subject, even if that editor is deeply committed to the subject. Baris 125: During debates on articles' talk pages and at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\|articles for deletion]], disparaging comments may fly about the subject of the article/author and the author's motives. These may border on forbidden [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks\|personal attacks]], and may discourage the article's creator from making future valuable contributions. '''Avoid using the word "vanity" or similar judgmental terms'''~~—this~~—this is accusatory and [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers\|discouraging]]. It is not helpful, nor reason to delete an article. [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith\|Assuming good faith]], start from the idea that the contributor was genuinely trying to help increase Wikipedia's coverage. ;Conflict of interest in point of view disputes Baris 256: [[Category:Wikipedia conflict of interest guidelines\| ]]--> == Catatan == {{Reflist}} Baris 272: [[it:Wikipedia:Pagine promozionali o celebrative]] [[ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:താത്പര്യവ്യത്യാസം]] [[pt:~~Wikipedia~~Wikipédia:Conflito de interesse]] [[ru:Википедия:Конфликт интересов]] [[sk:Wikipédia:Konflikt záujmov]]

Wikipedia:Konflik kepentingan: Perbedaan antara revisi