Wikipedia:Konflik kepentingan: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan
Baris 18:
 
If you have a conflict of interest, then any changes that might be seen as controversial or not [[WP:NPOV|strictly neutral]] should be first suggested on the relevant [[WP:TALK|talk page]] or [[WP:NOTICEBOARD|noticeboard]]. Before committing time or undertaking an agreement to write, you may also wish to seek advice before starting any new article in order to confirm it is suitable. It is also '''advisable''' to take similar care on subjects where you do not have a conflict of interest but do hold strong views or have a significant involvement.
-->
 
'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is in the real world|AnythingSemua youyang sayAnda andkatakan doatau onlakukan di Wikipedia candapat memiliki havekonsekuensi realdi worlddunia consequencesnyata]].''' COISuntingan editingdengan iskonflik routinelykepentingan exposedrutin anddiekspos can be reported adversely in thedi media. AllSemua editssuntingan aredirekam ondi theruang publicpublik recorddan andakan remaintetap soselamanya indefinitelydemikian. [[WP:OWN|YouAnda dotidak notmemiliki control articlesartikel]] anddan otherspenyunting maylain [[WP:DELPOL|delete]]mungkin themakan menghapusnya, keep themmembiarkannya, oratau addmenambahkan informationinformasi thatyang wouldmungkin havetidak remainedbanyak little-knowndiketahui. <!--While Wikipedians generally avoid naming editors and their paymasters, other media routinely do. This has led at times to extreme media embarrassment for the company or organization, dismissal (firing) of those at fault, and at times even court actions or charges, if done in a work or professional context. Editing in the interests of public relations (other than obvious corrections) is particularly frowned upon. This includes, but is not limited to, professionals paid to create or edit Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia is a very public forum, and news of attempts to improperly influence Wikipedia are frequently reported in the media.
 
When investigating possible cases of COI editing, Wikipedia's [[WP:HARASS|policy against harassment]] takes precedence and requires that Wikipedians must take care not to [[WP:OUTING|reveal the identity]] of other editors. Instead, [[WP:SPA|editors' behavior]] and [[WP:CHECK|trust-related tools]] can be used to evidence COI or other editorial abuse which avoids the need to formally identify the user. In other cases, carefully following Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view policy]] and other policies may help counteract biased editing.