Pelajari lebih lanjut tentang halaman ini

Ini adalah halaman pembicaraan untuk diskusi terkait perbaikan pada artikel Pengantar evolusi.
Halaman ini bukanlah sebuah forum untuk diskusi umum tentang subjek artikel.

Letakkan teks baru di bawah teks lama.
Tanda tangani pesan Anda dengan mengetikkan empat tilda (~~~~).
Baru bergabung dengan Wikipedia? Selamat datang! Pelajari cara menyunting; dapatkan bantuan.
Menemukan masalah di artikel? Ini 3 hal yang dapat Anda lakukan!

Kebijakan artikel

Cari sumber: "Pengantar evolusi" – berita · surat kabar · buku · cendekiawan · HighBeam · JSTOR · gambar bebas · sumber berita bebas · The Wikipedia Library · Referensi WP

Artikel ini adalah mantan artikel pilihan. Silakan lihat halaman nominasi awalnya (untuk artikel lama, lihat arsip nominasi) dan alasan pembatalannya.

ProyekWiki Biologi

(Dinilai kelas B)

Artikel ini berada dalam lingkup ProyekWiki Biologi, sebuah kolaborasi untuk meningkatkan kualitas Biologi di Wikipedia. Jika Anda ingin berpartisipasi, silakan kunjungi halaman proyek, dan Anda dapat berdiskusi dan melihat tugas yang tersedia.

B

Artikel ini telah dinilai sebagai kelas B pada skala kualitas proyek.

Evolusi atau Teori Evolusi ?

Saya lebih menyukai Teori Evolusi daripada Evolusi? Karena ada teori pembanding yang lebih kuat yakni teori Penciptaan. Banyak peneliti modern yang akhirnya gagal mendapatkan bukti-bukti yang kuat tentang keabsahan teori evolusi, bahkan bukti-bukti baru menunjukan kalau teori evolusi adalah sebuah dogma tanpa bukti ilmiah sama sekali. Penelitian tentang burung di Kepulauan Galapagos ditinjau dari ilmu biologi modern ternyata bukan evolusi tetapi hanya variasi spesies saja karena tidak ada ciri-ciri khusus yang bisa dianggap sebagai spesies baru.

Referensi

[1] [[2]] [3] [4]

Jika pembicaraan ini layak saya ingin menjadikan sub bagian Keruntuhan teori Evolusi sebagai bagian artikel ini

eMpu Pallawa (bicara) 03:22, 1 Mei 2010 (UTC)

Sebaiknya anda memberikan referensi berupa jurnal ilmiah. Karena yang dibicarakan adalah sains, maka patokan utamanya adalah jurnal ilmiah. Dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan, Evolusi adalah baik teori dan fakta, bukan hanya teori.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[7]^[10]^[11]

^ Moran, Laurence (1993-01-22). "Evolution is a Fact and a Theory" (html) (dalam bahasa english). Talk.origins. Diakses tanggal 2007-10-18.
^ Gould, Stephen Jay (1981-05-01). "Evolution as Fact and Theory". Discover. 2 (5): 34–37.
^ Vetter, Herbert F. (ed.) (1982). Speak Out Against The New Right. Beacon Press. ISBN 0807004863.
^ Gould, Stephen Jay (1994-04-01). Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes. New York. ISBN 0393017168.
^ Muller, H. J. (1959). "One hundred years without Darwin are enough". School Science and Mathematics. 59: 304–305.
^ Zetterberg, Peter (ed.) (1983-05-01). Evolution Versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy. Phoenix AZ: ORYX Press. ISBN 0897740610.
^ ^a ^b Campbell, Neil A. (2002-02-05). Biology 6th ed. Benjamin Cummings. hlm. 1175. ISBN 0805366245.
^ Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1973-03-01). "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution". American Biology Teacher. 35.
^ Zetterberg, Peter (ed.) (1983-05-01). Evolution Versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy. Phoenix AZ: ORYX Press. ISBN 0897740610.
^ Lenski, Richard E. (2000). "Evolution: Fact and Theory" (html) (dalam bahasa english). American Institute of Biological Sciences. Diakses tanggal 2007-10-18.
^ Mayr, Ernst. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-89666-1.

Hand15 (bicara) 03:53, 1 Mei 2010 (UTC)

Selain itu, silakan anda baca pernyataan berikut dari 68 akademi Sains nasional/internasional dari berbagai negara pada tahun 2006 Statement on the Teaching of Evolution( Pernyataan bersama yang dikeluarkan oleh akademi sains nasional dari berbagai negara):

“

IAP STATEMENT ON THE TEACHING OF EVOLUTION

We, the undersigned Academies of Sciences, have learned that in various parts of the world, within science courses taught in certain public systems of education, scientific evidence, data, and testable theories about the origins and evolution of life on Earth are being concealed, denied, or confused with theories not testable by science. We urge decision makers, teachers, and parents to educate all children about the methods and discoveries of science and to foster an understanding of the science of nature. Knowledge of the natural world in which they live empowers people to meet human needs and protect the planet. We agree that the following evidence-based facts about the origins and evolution of the Earth and of life on this planet have been established by numerous observations and independently derived experimental results from a multitude of scientific disciplines. Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change, scientific evidence has never contradicted these results:

In a universe that has evolved towards its present configuration for some 11 to 15 billion years, our Earth formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago.
Since its formation, the Earth – its geology and its environments – has changed under the effect of numerous physical and chemical forces and continues to do so.
Life appeared on Earth at least 2.5 billion years ago. The evolution, soon after, of photosynthetic organisms enabled, from at least 2 billion years ago, the slow transformation of the atmosphere to one containing substantial quantities of oxygen. In addition to the release of the oxygen that we breathe, the process of photosynthesis is the ultimate source of fixed energy and food upon which human life on the planet depends.
Since its first appearance on Earth, life has taken many forms, all of which continue to evolve, in ways which palaeontology and the modern biological and biochemical sciences are describing and independently confirming with increasing precision. Commonalities in the structure of the genetic code of all organisms living today, including humans, clearly indicate their common primordial origin.

.....

1. Albanian Academy of Sciences...25. Indonesian Academy of Sciences...61. The Royal Society, UK 62. US National Academy of Sciences...68. The Executive Board of the International Council for Science (ICSU)

”

Hand15 (bicara) 04:10, 1 Mei 2010 (UTC)

Fittest disini diterjemahkan sebagai terbugar, bukanlah lebih baik "tecocok"? --BlackKnight^{(kirim pesan)} 13:01, 1 Mei 2010 (UTC)

Sebenarnya ini ikut istilahnya glosarium pusat bahasa.Hand15 (bicara) 13:03, 1 Mei 2010 (UTC)

Bagian baru

[Moran-1] Moran, Laurence (1993-01-22). "Evolution is a Fact and a Theory" (html) (dalam bahasa english). Talk.origins. Diakses tanggal 2007-10-18.

[gouldfact-2] Gould, Stephen Jay (1981-05-01). "Evolution as Fact and Theory". Discover. 2 (5): 34–37.

[3] Vetter, Herbert F. (ed.) (1982). Speak Out Against The New Right. Beacon Press. ISBN 0807004863.

[4] Gould, Stephen Jay (1994-04-01). Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes. New York. ISBN 0393017168.

[Muller-5] Muller, H. J. (1959). "One hundred years without Darwin are enough". School Science and Mathematics. 59: 304–305.

[6] Zetterberg, Peter (ed.) (1983-05-01). Evolution Versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy. Phoenix AZ: ORYX Press. ISBN 0897740610.

[Campbell-7] Campbell, Neil A. (2002-02-05). Biology 6th ed. Benjamin Cummings. hlm. 1175. ISBN 0805366245.

[Dobzhansky-8] Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1973-03-01). "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution". American Biology Teacher. 35.

[9] Zetterberg, Peter (ed.) (1983-05-01). Evolution Versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy. Phoenix AZ: ORYX Press. ISBN 0897740610.

[Lenski-10] Lenski, Richard E. (2000). "Evolution: Fact and Theory" (html) (dalam bahasa english). American Institute of Biological Sciences. Diakses tanggal 2007-10-18.

[Mayr-11] Mayr, Ernst. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-89666-1.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

Pembicaraan:Pengantar evolusi

Evolusi atau Teori Evolusi ?

Referensi