Willard Van Orman Quine: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
baru Tag: |
baru |
||
Baris 26:
}}
|influenced = {{flatlist|
* [[Donald Davidson (
* [[Daniel Dennett]]
* [[David Lewis (
* [[Scott Soames]]
* [[David Kaplan (
* [[Richard Rorty]]
* [[Gila Sher]]
Baris 39:
}}
}}
'''Willard Van Orman Quine''' ({{lahirmati||25|6|1908||25|12|2000}}) (
Quine falls squarely into the analytic philosophy tradition while also being the main proponent of the view that philosophy is not merely [[conceptual analysis]]. His major writings include "[[Two Dogmas of Empiricism]]" (1951), which attacked the distinction between [[analytic proposition|analytic]] and [[synthetic proposition|synthetic]] [[proposition]]s and advocated a form of [[semantic holism]], and ''[[Word and Object]]'' (1960), which further developed these positions and introduced Quine's famous [[indeterminacy of translation]] thesis, advocating a [[behaviorist]] [[Meaning (philosophy of language)|theory of meaning]]. He also developed an influential [[naturalized epistemology]] that tried to provide "an improved scientific explanation of how we have developed elaborate scientific theories on the basis of meager sensory input."<ref name="iep">[http://www.iep.utm.edu/quine-sc/ "Quine's Philosophy of Science"]. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Iep.utm.edu. 27 July 2009. Accessed 8 March 2010.</ref> He is also important in [[philosophy of science]] for his "systematic attempt to understand science from within the resources of science itself"<ref name="iep" /> and for his conception of philosophy as continuous with science. This led to his famous quip that "philosophy of science is philosophy enough."<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/stable/2251091?cookieSet=1 "Mr Strawson on Logical Theory"]. WV Quine. ''Mind'' Vol. 62 No. 248. Oct. 1953.</ref> In [[philosophy of mathematics]], he and his Harvard colleague [[Hilary Putnam]] developed the "[[Philosophy of mathematics#Indispensability argument for realism|Quine-Putnam indispensability thesis]]," an argument for the [[Philosophy of mathematics#Empiricism|reality of mathematical entities]].<ref>Colyvan, Mark, [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/mathphil-indis/ "Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics"], The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)</ref>-->
|