Alfabet Paleo-Ibrani: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
k Bot: Perubahan kosmetika |
k Bot: Perubahan kosmetika |
||
Baris 135:
The Talmudic sages did not share a uniform stance on the subject of Ibrani Kuno. Some stated that Paleo-Hebrew was the original script used by the Israelites at the time of the Exodus,<ref>Sanhedrin 21</ref> while others believed that Paleo-Hebrew merely served as a stopgap in a time when the original script ([[Ashuri alphabet|The Assyrian Script]]) was lost.<ref>Megila 3, Shabbat 104</ref> According to both opinions, [[Ezra the Scribe]] (c. 500 BCE) introduced, or reintroduced the Assyrian script to be used as the primary Alphabet for the [[Hebrew language]].<ref>Sanhedrin 21</ref> The arguments given for both opinions are rooted in Jewish scripture and/or tradition.
A third, opinion<ref>Sanhedrin 22</ref> in the Talmud states that the script never changed altogether. It would seem that the sage who expressed this opinion did not believe that Paleo-Hebrew ever existed, despite the strong arguments supporting it. His stance is rooted in a scriptural verse,<ref>Exodus 27, 10</ref> which makes reference to the shape of the letter [[vav (letter)|vav]]. The sage argues further that, given the commandment to copy a Torah scroll directly from another, the script could not conceivably have been modified at any point. This third opinion was accepted by the early Jewish scholars
==Current use in Sacred Name Bibles==
| |||