Wilhelm Dilthey: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Rachmat-bot (bicara | kontrib)
k Bot: Penggantian teks otomatis (-Dimana +Di mana, -dimana +di mana); perubahan kosmetik
Wagino Bot (bicara | kontrib)
k minor cosmetic change
Baris 51:
Dilthey's ideas should be examined in terms of his similarities and differences with [[Wilhelm Windelband]] and [[Heinrich Rickert]], members of the [[Baden School]] of [[Neo-Kantianism]]. Dilthey was not a Neo-Kantian, but had a profound knowledge of [[Immanuel Kant]]'s philosophy, which deeply influenced his thinking. But whereas Neo-Kantianism was primarily interested in epistemology on the basis of [[Kant]]'s ''Critique of Pure Reason'', Dilthey took [[Kant]]'s ''Critique of Judgment'' as his point of departure. An important debate between Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians concerned the "human" as opposed to "cultural" sciences, with the Neo-Kantians arguing for the exclusion of psychology from the cultural sciences and Dilthey for its inclusion as a human science. -->
== Bacaan lebih jauh ==
 
* [[Rudolf A. Makkreel]], ''Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies'' (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).
* [[Jos de Mul]], ''The Tragedy of Finitude: Dilthey's Hermeneutics of Life'' (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).
Baris 68 ⟶ 69:
Schmidt, Lawrence K. (2006). ''Understanding Hermeneutics'', Durham: Acumen Publishing.
== Lihat pula ==
 
* [[Eksegesis]]
* [[Geistesgeschichte]]