Wikipedia:Artikel rintisan: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan
←Membatalkan revisi 2575185 oleh 203.160.128.8 (Bicara)
Baris 137:
[[zh-min-nan:Wikipedia:Phí]]
[[zh-yue:Wikipedia:楔位文章]]
PT. TPL overacting to klaim people’s garden
If we read the news about PT TPL to klaim pople’s garden, it seems officials pro people. The game is very different games with people. Game is the return rights of the people who are hereditary. Anyone who does not particularly respect rights that have been in powerfull of heredity, is the result of sweat harassment against fathers. What we, the people who still live in the area of “Bona Pasogit”, or not, would appreciate “bonani pinasana”. then anyone who violates their rights but at the time was the same claim with the "war" against the violation. So in this case, local government officials should be able to pro-empaty against how to feeling that people abuse the right to receive treatment. The only hope that people do not declare "war" is a law enforcement officer and the Regional Government, as the take area. So the game, how to weaken the defense of communities against officials, at the time that is the feeling of community disappear defend the rights futile. As a result of a miss occurs the trust between the community with local government officials. If we take it one case example of kemenyaan garden. At the time kemenyaan due to how people will be respected in the socialclass in the community, and the government was never proud of the area as kemenyaan, even until now Bagamat predicate of "kemenyaan world" is the area Tapanuli. If this can be repeated by the local government as a "track record" of regional government, not possible if the local government officials and Law Enforcement does not want the game late in the this case. PT.TPL.(beresman)