# meminta penghapusan mengikuti [[Wikipedia:Kriteria penghapusan cepat]].
lain pada kasus khusus==
The following sections discuss alternate methods for establishing notability in specific situations. '''No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization.''' These criteria constitute an optional, alternative method for demonstrating notability. Organizations are considered notable if they meet one of the following sourcing requirements
# these alternate criteria,
the [[#Primary criteria| primary criteria]] for organizations, ''or''
the [[WP:GNG| general notability guideline]]
and'' the article complies with the policy [[Wikipedia: What Wikipedia is not]], especially with regards to avoiding indiscriminate inclusion of information.
Organizations are usually notable if they meet '''both''' of the following standards:
# The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
# The organization has received significant coverage in multiple [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:Independent sources|independent]] of the organization.
Additional considerations are:
* ''Nationally well-known local organizations:'' Some organizations are local in scope, but have achieved national or even international notice. Organizations whose activities are local in scope (e.g., a school or club) can be considered notable if there is [[WP:NRVE|substantial verifiable evidence of coverage]] by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, consider adding a section on the organization to an article on the organization's local area instead.
* ''Factors that have attracted widespread attention:'' The organization’s longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals, or other factors specific to the organization should be considered to the extent that these factors have been reported by independent sources. This list is not exhaustive and not conclusive.
*Caveat – Be cautious of claims that small organizations are national or international in scale. The fact that an organization has branches in multiple countries does not ''necessarily'' mean that its activities are ''truly'' international. Example: a tiny fraternal organization with a total membership of sixty members, worldwide, is not "international in scale" simply because the members live in separate countries and have formed sub-chapters where they live.
====Local units of larger organizations====