Wikipedia:Kelayakan artikel/Organisasi dan perusahaan: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
RaFaDa20631 (bicara | kontrib)
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan
RaFaDa20631 (bicara | kontrib)
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan
Baris 207:
# meminta penghapusan mengikuti [[Wikipedia:Kriteria penghapusan cepat]].
 
==Kriteria lainalternatif pada kasus khusus==
Bagian ini membahas kasus spesifik jenis organisasinya. '''Tidak ada organisasi yang layak dituliskan kecuali sumber independen sudah menunjukkan bahwa organisasi sudah dikenal di kalangan masyarakat luas.''' Meski opsional, artikel bertopik organisasi dapat layak bila memenuhi salah satu kriteria ini:
The following sections discuss alternate methods for establishing notability in specific situations. '''No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization.''' These criteria constitute an optional, alternative method for demonstrating notability. Organizations are considered notable if they meet one of the following sourcing requirements
# kriteria alternatif ini,
# these alternate criteria,
# the [[#Primary criteria|primarykriteria criteriapokok]] for organizations, ''or''atau
# the [[WP:GNG|generalkriteria notabilitykelayakan guidelineumum]]
 
''anddan'' thememenuhi article complies with the policykebijakan [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is notbukanlah]], especially with regards toterkait avoidinginformasi indiscriminateyang inclusiontidak ofperlu informationdimasukkan.
 
===Non-commercialOrganisasi organizationsnonkomersial===
{{shortcut|WP:CLUB|WP:NONPROFIT|WP:NGO}}
Organisasi dapat layak apabila memenuhi dua hal berikut:
Organizations are usually notable if they meet '''both''' of the following standards:
# berskala nasional atau internasional, dan
# The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
# telah mendapatkan informasi yang sudah dibahas dalam [[WP:RS|sumber tepercaya]] yang independen.
# The organization has received significant coverage in multiple [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:Independent sources|independent]] of the organization.
 
Tambahan lainnya:
Additional considerations are:
* ''Organisasi lokal yang terkenal secara nasional:'' Beberapa organisasi ada yang berskala lokal, tetapi sudah mendapatkan perhatian secara nasional bahkan internasional. Organisasi yang aktivitasnya lokal dalam lingkupnya (seperti sekolah atau klub) dianggap layak asalkan memberikan [[WP:NRVE|bukti-bukti]] dari sumber tepercaya independen di luar wilayah organisasi itu. Meski hanya lokal, pertimbangkan untuk menambah bagian mengenai organisasi itu pada artikel bertopik wilayah operasinya, alih-alih.
* ''Nationally well-known local organizations:'' Some organizations are local in scope, but have achieved national or even international notice. Organizations whose activities are local in scope (e.g., a school or club) can be considered notable if there is [[WP:NRVE|substantial verifiable evidence of coverage]] by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, consider adding a section on the organization to an article on the organization's local area instead.
* ''Faktor yang menarik perhatian masyarakat luas:'' Umur organisasi, jumlah keanggotaan, prestasi, skandal, atau faktor lainnya harus dipertimbangkan sudah dilaporkan sumber independen.
* ''Factors that have attracted widespread attention:'' The organization’s longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals, or other factors specific to the organization should be considered to the extent that these factors have been reported by independent sources. This list is not exhaustive and not conclusive.
*Awas – Hati-hati dengan organisasi kecil yang mengklaim dirinya nasional atau internasional. Organisasi yang memiliki cabang di banyak negara ''belum tentu'' aktivitasnya berskala internasional. Misal: organisasi trah dengan anggota 60 orang di seluruh dunia sama sekali tidak bisa disebut "berskala internasional" karena anggotanya tinggal di negara berbeda dan memiliki cabangnya sendiri-sendiri.
*Caveat – Be cautious of claims that small organizations are national or international in scale. The fact that an organization has branches in multiple countries does not ''necessarily'' mean that its activities are ''truly'' international. Example: a tiny fraternal organization with a total membership of sixty members, worldwide, is not "international in scale" simply because the members live in separate countries and have formed sub-chapters where they live.
 
====Local units of larger organizations====