Ekbatana: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
k Bot: Perubahan kosmetika |
k ibukota → ibu kota |
||
Baris 71:
== Kontroversi ==
Orang Yunani menganggap Ekbatana adalah
-->
Tetapi pengkaitan dengan tempat penggalian ini diperdebatkan karena saat ini tidak ada bukti kehadiran orang Media di Hagmatana hill sebelum zaman Parthia sesudahnya.<ref>[http://www.chnpress.com/news/?section=2&id=6905 CHN | News]</ref><!-- Similarly, [[Assyria]]n sources never mention Hagmatana/Ecbatana. Some scholars believe the problem can be resolved by identifying the Ecbatana/Hagmatana mentioned in later Greek and Achaemenid sources with the city Sagbita/Sagbat frequently mentioned in Assyrian texts, since the [[Indo-Iranian languages|Indo-Iranian]] sound /s/ became /h/ in many [[Iranian languages]]. The Sagbita mentioned by Assyrian sources was located in the proximity of the cities Kishesim (Kar-Nergal) and Harhar (Kar-Sharrukin).<ref>[http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-132797080.html I.N. Medvedskaya, Were the Assyrians at Ecbatana?, Jan, 2002]</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0SBL/is_16/ai_n13810182/pg_5 | work=International Journal of Kurdish Studies | title=Were the Assyrians at Ecbatana? | first=I.N. | last=Medvedskaya | year=2002}}</ref>
Baris 78:
-->
Ekbatana merupakan
== Lihat pula ==
|