Ketef Hinnom: Perbedaan revisi

2 bita ditambahkan ,  4 tahun yang lalu
KH1 was found in Square D, the middle of the repository, 7 cm above the floor, while KH2 was found while sifting dirt from the lower half of the deposits in Square A, the innermost portion of the repository. Both amulets were separated from [[Hellenistic]] artifacts by 3 meters of length and 25 cm of depth, and embedded in pottery and other material from the 7th/6th centuries BCE.
-->
 
Barkay awalnya meberimemberi tarikh akhir abad ke-7/awal abad ke-6 SM untuk pembuatan inskripsi, tetapi kemudian mengubahnya menjadi awal abad ke-6 SM berdasarkan studi [[paleografi]] (bentuk irisan yang cermat pada penulisan [[abjad Ibrani Kuno]]) dan bukti perangkat keramik di sekitar tempat penemuan.<!-- This dating was subsequently questioned by Johannes Renz and Wolfgang Rollig,<ref>Renz, Johannes and Wolfgang Röllig, ''Handbuch der althebräischen Epigraphik'' (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1995).</ref> who argued that the script was in too poor a condition to be dated with certainty and that a 3rd/2nd century BCE provenance could not be excluded, especially as the repository, which had been used as a kind of "rubbish bin" for the burial chamber over many centuries, also contained material from the fourth century BCE.
-->
Penelitian ulang gulungan-gulungan itu kemudian dilakukan oleh [[University of Southern California]] dalam rangka West Semitic Research Project, menggunakan teknik ''advanced photographic and computer enhancement'' yang dapat membaca gulungan itu lebih mudah serta penentuan tarikh menurut paleografi yang lebih pasti. Hasilnya menegaskan suatu tarikh pembuatan sesaat sebelum kehancuran Yerusalem oleh tentara Babel pada tahun 586/7 SM.<ref>Barkay, G., A.G. Vaughn, M.J. Lundberg and B. Zuckerman, "The Amulets from Ketef Hinnom: A New Edition and Evaluation," ''Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research'' 334 (2004): 41-71. (An innovation in the report was the simultaneous publication of an accompanying "digital article," a CD version of the article and the images).</ref> Dr. Kyle McCarter dari [[Johns Hopkins University]], seorang spesialis [[:En:Semitic scripts|tulisan Semitik]] kuno, berkata bahwa studi tersebut tentunya "menjelaskan kontroversi apa pun mengenai [penetapan tarikh] inskripsi-inskripsi ini".<ref name=Silver>[http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/28/science/28scro.html?_r=1&8dpc=&pagewanted=all&position=&oref=slogin "Solving a Riddle Written in Silver", New York Times, 2004].</ref>