This file is from the English Wikipedia. It represents the largest uncontroversial linguistic macrofamilies using the color scheme from en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages. (Thus, Japanese and Korean are represented as language isolates, despite various contested theories linking them to other families (probably Altaic family) or each other.)
Due to the lack of sourcing and the inherent imprecision of the Robinson projection, this should be taken as a somewhat impressionistic representation.
A policy needs to be adopted regarding autochtonous languages versus imported (colonial) languages. Why has Equatorial Guinea been marked Indo-European because Spanish is spoken there, but other African countries, where English, French or Portuguese are spoken, haven't? Sure EG should be changed back to the autochtonous language group?
On 26 October 2005, en:User:Ishwar added the Nadene family with its color and added color specks for the Hopi, Havasupai, Western Apache, Choctaw, Cherokee, Mescalero, Zuni, Keres, Sioux languages. (although these are hardly visible.)
On 9 November 2005, en:User:Peter Farago corrected errors in Hainan and Taiwan, pointed out by en:User:ran on en:Image talk:Human Language Families Map (Wikipedia Colors .PNG; corrected error in Malta; replaced the paraphyletic "Australian languages" group with the well-attested Pama-Nyungan family (redrawn after this source), marking the non-Pama-Nyungan languages as isolates; and recolored Greenland and the Queen Elizabeth Islands to indicate that they are uninhabited, not language isolates.
On 21 June 2006, es:Usuario:Satesclop noted Spanish-speaking populations in Equatorial Guinea and the Canary Islands, and added cross-hatching to indicate Spanish speakers in the interior of South America.
I can't see the Basque language in Northern Spain any more, so I reverted it to remove the foggyness/deletion of the Baques.--213.232.79.149 08:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
The Australian Indigenous languages covering the northern part of Australia somehow got lost between version 29th of May and 30th of May - can someone please put them back in or say why they have been removed? thanks 129.215.149.99 12:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
untuk berbagi – untuk menyalin, mendistribusikan dan memindahkan karya ini
untuk menggubah – untuk mengadaptasi karya ini
Berdasarkan ketentuan berikut:
atribusi – Anda harus mencantumkan atribusi yang sesuai, memberikan pranala ke lisensi, dan memberi tahu bila ada perubahan. Anda dapat melakukannya melalui cara yang Anda inginkan, namun tidak menyatakan bahwa pemberi lisensi mendukung Anda atau penggunaan Anda.
berbagi serupa – Apabila Anda menggubah, mengubah, atau membuat turunan dari materi ini, Anda harus menyebarluaskan kontribusi Anda di bawah lisensi yang sama seperti lisensi pada materi asli.
Label lisensi ini ditambahkan pada berkas sebagai bagian dari pemutakhiran lisensi GFDL.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/CC BY-SA 3.0Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0truetrue
Diizinkan untuk menyalin, mendistribusikan dan/atau memodifikasi dokumen ini di bawah syarat-syarat Lisensi Dokumentasi Bebas GNU, Versi 1.2 atau lebih baru yang diterbitkan oleh Free Software Foundation; tanpa Bagian Invarian, tanpa Teks Sampul Depan, dan tanpa Teks Sampul Belakang. Salinan lisensi dimasukkan ke bagian yang berjudul Lisensi Dokumentasi Bebas GNU. Subject to disclaimers.http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue
Captions
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Partial restorion of original upload. The Turkish and Azerbaijani language areas do touch each other at Nakhichevan. Separately, the Caucasian and Mongolian languages families don't border each other, despite the proximity.
updated/fixed, (fix: included the turkic, tungusic and mongolic language family as official census propose) matching the linguistic classification of language families. (stand:2017)
Berkas ini mengandung informasi tambahan yang mungkin ditambahkan oleh kamera digital atau pemindai yang digunakan untuk membuat atau mendigitalisasi berkas. Jika berkas ini telah mengalami modifikasi, rincian yang ada mungkin tidak secara penuh merefleksikan informasi dari gambar yang sudah dimodifikasi ini.